| You are here: Agriculture > Genfood and Food > Food from GMO > Field trials 
 
 
 1. IntroductionBiotechnological procedures have been employed over millennia
	to produce human food stuffs such as bread, yoghurt, beer, wine
	or cheese. Ancient peoples made use of microorganisms like yeast
	and bacteria without even knowing of their existence. Today, we
	know that there are innumerable distinct yeast and bacterial strains,
	some of which are exploited in commercial fermentation processes
	after having being selected for certain characteristics to optimise
	product quality or production processes (Hui and Khachatourians,
	1995). Only limited information is available about the genetic
	background of the specific traits of most of the microorganisms
	we employ today in fermentation processes. Modern techniques of
	biotechnology make it possible to introduce distinct genes or
	groups of genes into a variety of organisms. The application of
	genetic engineering has become essential for biotechnology and
	many other modern biological and medical sciences. Apart from amylases which have been used for starch processing
	since the early 1980s, chymosin was the first commercial biotechnology
	product to be used in human food stuffs. It serves as a substitute
	for the calf stomach preparations, traditionally used as the natural
	source of chymosin, in the manufacture of cheese (Teuber, 1993).
	Although approved for use in cheese production by Swiss authorities
	as early as 1988, recombinantly produced chymosin has never been
	commercially used in this country due to a voluntary renunciation
	by the cheese manufacturers. It has since been approved in more
	than 20 countries (Teuber, 1993); more than 60 % of the hard cheese
	in the United States is produced by means of recombinantly produced
	chymosin. Germany, on the other hand, represents one of the more
	prominent countries that have not (yet) approved this product
	(Krohn and Pfleger, 1994). In some countries other recombinantly expressed enzymes and organic
	molecules produced through genetic engineering have also been
	approved. However, regulations with respect to enzymes and other
	products produced by genetically modified microorganisms differ
	significantly from nation to nation.
 1.1 Field trialsGenetic engineering of agricultural crops has become a main activity
	of the research departments in the agro-industry. GMOs comprising
	at least 27 distinct plant species have been tested in field trials
	in the European Community (EC) (Table 1).  
 Table 1: Field tests in the European Community and in the
	United States 
	
		| 
				
					| Plant | EC* | USA** |  
					| Alfalfa | 2 | 18 |  
					| Amelanchier laevis |  | < 6 |  
					| Apple | 1 | 5 |  
					| Arabidopsis |  | < 6 |  
					| Barley |  | < 6 |  
					| Belladonna |  | < 6 |  
					| Broccoli |  | < 6 |  
					| Carnation | 3 |  |  
					| Carrot | 1 | < 6 |  
					| Cauliflower | 5 |  |  
					| Chicory | 32 | < 6 |  
					| Chrysanthemum | 1 | < 6 |  
					| Cotton | 1 | 191 |  
					| Cranberry |  | < 6 |  
					| Creeping Bentgrass |  | 7 |  
					| Cucumber |  | 12 |  
					| Eggplant |  | < 6 |  
					| Eucalyptus | 3 |  |  
					| Gladiolus |  | < 6 |  
					| Grapevine | 2 | < 6 |  
					| Lettuce | 4 | 6 |  
					| Maize (corn) | 192 | 1019 |  
					| Marigold | 8 |  |  
					| Melon | 4 | 106*** |  
					| Onion |  | <6 |  
					| Subtotal | 295 | - |  | 
				
					| Plant | EC* | USA** |  
					| Papaya |  | < 6 |  
					| Pea |  | < 6 |  
					| Peanut |  | < 6 |  
					| Pepper |  | < 6 |  
					| Petunia | 1 | < 6 |  
					| Plum |  | < 4 |  
					| Poplar | 6 | < 6 |  
					| Potato | 86 | 261 |  
					| Rape / oilseed rape | 188 | 57 |  
					| Rice |  | 13 |  
					| Silver birch | 1 |  |  
					| Soybean | 6 | 278 |  
					| Spruce |  | < 6 |  
					| Squash | 2 | 106*** |  
					| Strawberry | 1 | 5 |  
					| Sugarbeet | 109 | 23 |  
					| Sugarcane |  | < 6 |  
					| Sunflower | 6 | 8 |  
					| Sweet Potato |  | < 6 |  
					| Sweetgum |  | < 6 |  
					| Tobacco | 30 | 98 |  
					| Tomato | 45 | 321 |  
					| Walnut |  | < 6 |  
					| Watermelon |  | < 6 |  
					| Wheat | 6 | 14 |  
					| Total | 746 | ca. 2450 |  |  * Source: SNIFS (1996) as of 31 October 1996** Source: APHIS ('Field Test Permits' and 'Notifications' 1987-1996,
	as of 31 October 1996)
 the numbers marked with *** represent the sum of melon and squash field
	releases in the US.
 Most of the field tests within the EC were performed in Belgium,
	France, Italy, the Netherlands and in the United Kingdom (81 %;
	>70 field tests per country); only 19 % of the releases took
	place in Austria, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Portugal, Spain and
	Sweden (SNIFS, 1996). Until October 1996, only 2 field tests had
	been conducted in Austria and 2 in Switzerland, and 60 in Germany.
	In contrast, the number of field tests in France totalled 228
	and in the United States with more than 2,000
	1. This uneven distribution
	is only partially accountable by regulatory and climatic differences
	of the countries cited; differences in the general public acceptance
	of gene technology in each country apparently plays an important
	role. In particular, the German-speaking populations in Europe
	appear more sceptical than others towards the application of this
	technology in the food industry. The public attitude towards gene
	technology should not be overlooked; in 1995, more than half of
	the field sites in Germany for testing transgenic plants were
	deliberately destroyed (Abbott, 1996; Hobom, 1996).   Figure 1: Field tests of the most common transgenic crops.
	Sources: (i) USA: APHIS ('Field Test Permits' and 'Notifications'
	1987-1996, as of 31 October 1996; (ii) EU: SNIFS (1996) as of
	31 October 1996; (iii) Others (Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Japan,
	New Zealand, Switzerland, South Africa and several developing
	countries): OECD-database on field trials as of 24 October 1996;
	DeKathen, 1996. The list of transgenic plants which have been field tested in
	the US is far more extensive than the one for the EC (Table 1,
	Figure 1). In Canada1, several hundred field tests have taken
	place. Approximately 150 releases have been reported in developing
	countries (De Kathen, 1996)1. Until 31 December 1995, reportedly
	11 and 22 field tests took place in Russia and Hungary, whereas
	the figure of 60 field tests was reported for China (James and
	Krattiger, 1996). A single approval for a field test can include
	several field sites. This may in part be accountable for the fact
	that figures for the field tests in certain countries given by
	James and Krattiger (1996) are somewhat higher than e.g. the numbers
	derived from the 'summary notifications' (SNIFS) in the EC. Most of the research in the application of gene technology on
	food crops has sought to improve product quality and agronomic
	traits and develop resistance to pests (Table 2). Background literature
	about techniques and research goals in the area of transgenic
	plants can be found in recently published reviews (Lupi, 1995;
	Bendiek et al., 1996; James and Krattiger, 1996; Niederhauser
	et al., 1996; Estruch et al., 1997; Gaede, 1997), in special issues
	of journals in German (Biologie in unserer Zeit 4/1995: 'Gentechnik
	und Lebensmittel') or English (Trends in Biotechnology: 'Plant-product
	and crop biotechnology', Vol. 13 [9], 1995) and in books (Brandt,
	1995; Potrykus and Spangenberg, 1995). Table 2: Research objectives 
	
		| I Product quality: | 
				Carbohydrate metabolismColourdurabilityFatty acid metabolismFirmnessFruit ripening delayProcessing value |  
		| II Pest resistance: | 
				Bacterial resistanceFungal resistanceInsect resistanceNematode resistanceViral resistance |  
		| III Agronomic trait: | 
				Drought resistanceHerbicide toleranceHybrid systemNitrate reductionSalt toleranceTemperature resistance |  
		| IV Others: | 
				Heavy metal toleranceMonitoring |  
 1 Data from various sources on field trials
	in the US, the EC as a whole and individual EC countries (Austria, Belgium,
	Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain,
	United Kingdom), Switzerland, Bulgaria, Canada, Australia, New
	Zealand, Japan and some developing countries (Argentina, Belize,
	Bolivia, Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Egypt, Guatemala,
	India, Mexico, Peru, South Africa, Thailand and the Commonwealth
	of Puerto Rico) are continuously being compiled in a database
	at the agency BATS. 
 
 |